How Cannabis Will Affect Housing in Halton

Published November 13, 2018 at 9:41 pm

While cannabis has been legal throughout Canada since Oct. 17, it’s not yet clear what kind of affect the newly legalized substance will have on the country’s real estate and rental market.

While cannabis has been legal throughout Canada since Oct. 17, it’s not yet clear what kind of affect the newly legalized substance will have on the country’s real estate and rental market.

As you no doubt recall, Bill C-45–the Cannabis Act–allows Canadians to purchase, consume and grow limited amounts of cannabis from a provincially-regulated retailer (as of now, that’s the Ontario Cannabis Store, which is an e-commerce platform).

But while consumers are generally happy with legalization (hiccups with orders and delivery notwithstanding), real estate website Zoocasa says the new law could impact the housing market. 

“While the future may be green, just how legal cannabis will impact the real estate industry – including homeowners, prospective buyers, renters and landlords – remains one big grey area,” says Penelope Graham, managing editor, Zoocasa.

“That’s because, despite the drug’s newly-minted legal status, questions linger over how personal use and cultivation may impact the value, desirability, and even the insurable status of homes for sale.”

As of now, stigma pervades among current and prospective homeowners, as well as those renting out their property. 

According to a new national survey conducted by Zoocasa that polled over 1,300 Canadians, sentiments remain largely negative regarding the following issues: 

  • Consumption and cultivation in private residences

  • Living in close proximity to where legal cannabis is sold

  • Tenant and landlord rights when it comes to the presence of legal cannabis in a rental unit

According to the survey data, most Canadians feel that smoking cannabis inside their homes is a generally bad idea. A full 64 per cent of those who indicated they were homeowners felt doing so would harm its resale value, an increase from the 39 per cent who indicated as such in Zoocasa’s previous Housing Trends Report.

Zoocasa says that 57 per cent of homeowners  felt that growing even the legal amount of cannabis (up to four plants), would have a negative impact on a home’s value.

This stigma extends to prospective home buyers, too: A total of 52% respondents say they’d be less likely to consider specific houses for sale if they knew even a legal amount of cannabis had been grown in them,” Zoocasa says.




Additional Stats

  • 57% of homeowners feel that cultivating even a legal amount of cannabis inside a home will negatively impact the home’s resale value; 26% disagree, while 18% are neutral.

  • Of homeowners who agree home cultivation would harm home values, only 6% would take the risk of doing so. However, of the of respondents who rent and indicated they felt home cultivation would negatively impact values, 19% said they would still consider home cultivation.

  • 64% of respondents who indicated they are homeowners believe smoking cannabis inside the home will devalue it; 21% of respondents disagree, while 15% are neutral.

  • In contrast, 46% of respondents who indicated they are renters agree smoking cannabis would devalue their unit; 33% disagree, while 20% are neutral.

  • 15% of all respondents indicated they would consider home cannabis cultivation.

  • Millennials are demographically least likely to consider home cultivation stigmatizing, with only 38% indicating that a legal amount of cannabis grown in a home would reduce their desire to buy that property, compared to 58% of Gen Xers and 59% of Boomers.

Homeowners are also worried about cannabis dispensaries moving into their neighbourhoods.

Zoocasa’s findings reveal that 42 per cent respondents feel having a cannabis dispensary in the neighbourhood would harm the value of nearby homes.

A whopping 48 per cent of respondents stated the presence of a dispensary nearby would reduce their desire to purchase a specific property.

However, those who already live by a local dispensary (16 per cent of all respondents) are more likely to be comfortable with the presence of one (58 per cent). That said, 54 per cent of those who don’t live near a dispensary aren’t comfortable with one moving into their neck of the woods. 

Only 14 per cent of all respondents said they would feel uncomfortable with a new liquor store opening in their neighbourhood.




Additional Stats

  • 42% of all respondents say having a cannabis dispensary in the neighbourhood would reduce nearby home values; 34% disagree, while 23% are neutral.

  • Only 11% of all respondents feel a new liquor store would reduce the value of nearby homes; 63% disagree, with 26% neutral.

  • 58% of respondents who currently live close to a dispensary are comfortable with its presence. Of those respondents, 71% of respondents who currently live close to a liquor store are comfortable having that store in their proximity.

  • 54% of respondents who do not currently live close to a dispensary would be uncomfortable with one opening nearby, while 26% would feel comfortable, and 20% are neutral. Out of respondents who do not currently live near a liquor store, only 29% are uncomfortable with having a liquor store in the neighbourhood, while 34% would be comfortable, and 37% are neutral.

  • Millennials are least likely to be pessimistic about the presence of a dispensary, with only 31% indicating they’d feel a dispensary would reduce the value of homes nearby, compared to 50% of Xers and 47% of Boomers.

Cannabis is especially complex for those who live in high-rise condos and apartments. 

“One of the most hotly debated pre-legalization topics is whether those who live in close proximity to their neighbours – such as condo unit owners and renters – should have the same ability to consume cannabis as those who live in detached homes, as condo boards and rental management have fought to control or ban use prior to legalization,” says Graham.

Zoocasa says that according to the data, the majority of Canadians aren’t in favour of condo or apartment consumption, with 61 per cent of all respondents saying that residents should not be able to smoke cannabis within their units, and 64 per cent believing boards and property managers should be able to ban the drug’s use in residents’ units. 

Renters are a little unclear on how the rules will work for them.

Zoocasa says just 32 per cent of tenants polled say they don’t know, while an additional 32 per cent say they’re unsure. Only 36 per cent say they understand their home cannabis consumption rights.

In comparison, Zoocasa says 67 per cent of landlords agreed they understand their rights regarding what can and can’t be enforced when it comes to tenants smoking or cultivating the drug on their property. Interestingly, 65 per cent of landlords say they would consider lowering rent for tenants who do not smoke cannabis.





Additional Stats

  • Of those who indicated they are renters, 35% agree that tenants should be able to smoke cannabis inside their homes; 46% do not agree, while 19% are neutral.

  • 88% of those who indicated they are landlords said they want, or plan, to ban smoking within their rental properties; 7% do not want to or plan to, while 5% are neutral.

  • 13% of renters who currently smoke cannabis inside their homes (whether it’s a few times a year to daily) say they would be willing to pay a higher rent for the ability to smoke in their homes; 74% would not be willing to, while 13% are neutral.

  • 47% of landlords say they plan to, or would want to, charge higher rent due to cannabis smoking becoming legal; 24% do not plan to or want to, while 29% are neutral.

  • 43% of renters who do not smoke cannabis feel landlords should lower rent for tenants who don’t smoke in their homes; 65% of landlords would actually consider doing this, while 27% of landlords would not, and 7% are neutral. 

Zoocasa says the findings are based on an online survey conducted by from Sep 27, 2018 to Oct 3, 2018 of over 1,380 respondents who live in Canada. The estimated margin of error is +/- 2.6 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

insauga's Editorial Standards and Policies advertising