How People Get Around and Commute in Mississauga


Published January 23, 2017 at 5:31 pm


For years, Peel Region has been growing at an exponential rate, but much of that growth has centred on development around the automobile. If the 1.5 million that populates this region were all autonomous vehicles, I don’t think there would be an issue to discuss at all. But that is currently not the case, as people are clamouring for more public transit modes and alternative ways of getting around that lead to better lifestyles and a cleaner environment, as well as to alleviate congestion.

So Peel Region has to look at ways to expand its transportation network. Which is why they launched what they call an extensive public consultation the past week with display boards and staff to address people’s concerns. The final public open house for this phase was held at Erin Mills Town Centre. Here are some of the graphics presented with information and statistics about Peel Region’s transportation network and infrastructure.

As you can see from the above graphic, the majority of Peel residents, some 66 per cent, are car drivers. The rest of those surveyed are cyclists, pedestrians, carpoolers and transit riders. The percentage of Peel residents that use transit annually is high compared to other jurisdictions in the GTA. Between 2013 to 2015, transit ridership grew in Brampton and Mississauga by 15.4 per cent and almost eight per cent, respectively. In comparison, the TTC only experienced a 4.5 per cent and GO Transit got a minor 1.3 per cent increase in transit ridership. Areas such as York Region, Oakville and Burlington actually experienced decreases.

These following graphics show the number of people who either travel to, from or through Peel for work purposes. There are 523,000 people who work within Peel Region whose commute consists of staying within the regional boundaries.

Based on these numbers, it looks like there are more people commuting out of Peel than coming in. In total, 148,000 people travel from other areas to Peel for work and 175,000 still commute from Peel not only to Toronto, but to Hamilton, Barrie and York Region as well.

Another problem is that people drive when they could walk or bicycle to their destination. The idea is to gradually flip the ratio of higher numbers of car users than transit users the other way, but there doesn’t seem to be much optimism that the numbers for pedestrians and cyclists will increase at the same rate.

The Region could start by implementing bicycle lanes along all regional roads in Mississauga and Brampton in order to put down the infrastructure to start incentivizing cyclists to use their bicycles as a viable transportation option. But these kind of projects usually start by measuring whether the ridership is there, which only exacerbates the lack of cycling infrastructure and continues the disincentivization of it. I wonder if this is something that Mississauga’s Cycling Infrastructure Committee has examined?

In Mississauga, there are regional roads that Peel is responsible for overseeing and you can see those maps here. Awhile back, I wrote about how Mississauga council was proposing to take control of maintaining regional roads within the city. While it may cause some controversial and heated discussion at Regional Council (especially from those who see this as a backdoor attempt by Mississauga to leave Peel Region), there doesn’t seem to be that many regional roadways in Mississauga anyway; there seems to be more regional roadways in Brampton and Caledon.

If Missisauga did assume jurisdiction over the regional roads in the city, there would be little effect in terms of Mississauga’s overall traffic flow, since most of the roads within Mississauga are Mississauga’s anyway.

No public open house consultation would be complete without writing down your suggestions on post-it notes and sticking them to a large display map. Here are some of the ideas people wrote down as propositions to be part of a new transportation strategy:

  • New bridge construction should be accompanied by new sidewalks and less guardrails
  • Culham Trail should extend north to south (any gaps should be filled in)
  • Bicycle crossings at QEW and Highways 401, 403 and 407
  • Lengthening the crossing time at Mavis and Britannia Road (the writer says there is only 16 seconds to cross 4 lanes)
  • Sunday closing of streets to allow non motorized modes of transportation use
  • Connect and complete disconnected streets

The last point regarding completing ‘disconnected’ streets is akin to the idea of Complete Streets. For a brief primer on what they are, please see this report from the Transportation Association of Canada. The idea centres around designing and planning streets that diversify street use for more than just automobiles, thus allowing for more common pedestrian and public transit use.

As for Sunday closures of streets for non motorized use, there are certain weekends in downtown Toronto where a portion of Yonge Street is closed off for such purposes, and the result was very positive for Toronto residents. In Mississauga, I’ve heard Councillor Nando Iannicca mention that Burnhamthorpe along the City Centre area could try closing down for certain days for non vehicle activity.

As for the feasibility of bicycle crossing at major provincial highways, that would be a tough sell. How many people would willingly take their bikes on a busy highway like the 401 or even the QEW; the only time those routes are closed for cyclists is if there is some kind of weekend marathon.

Peel Region’s population will grow by nearly 40 per cent by 2041. The current roads cannot accommodate the equivalent growth in cars, and widening roads is not a desirable solution. You can imagine how the same number of people, each driving their own vehicle, can be accommodated by a lesser number of bicycles or one single bus. The amount of space freed up on a road would allow for the implementation of complete street design and more efficient uses for roads.

There were a number of fatal and serious collisions between 2010 and 2014. During that four-year period, there were 4,386 fatal and injury causing collisions at intersections. Other accidents (1,875, to be exact) occurred because of aggressive driving and 1,114 happened when drivers were distracted or inattentive. Meanwhile, pedestrians and cyclists cause a rather low number of collisions. Perhaps some new methods of designing intersections could be incorporated as part of this long term transportation plan?

Surprisingly, at fault heavy trucks caused the least amount of collisions, despite the vast network of truck routes in Peel and the region’s long history as an area with a large number of trucking industry and goods movement businesses.

It would definitely be helpful to move away from our current transportation model so that cars don’t always come as the first choice for residents. Look at Vancouver. They prioritize things in this order: 1. pedestrians, 2. cyclists, 3. public transit, 4. shipment of goods, and finally 5. cars. If you have ever been to Vancouver you can see how this prioritization has transformed the cityscape.

I’m not saying Peel Region should copy Vancouver down to the last details, but it would help. There will definitely be further public consultations and meetings on this very important topic. So if you’re interested in providing feedback, please go and add your suggestions on their website and sign up for latest updates.

Follow me on Twitter at @thekantastic

insauga's Editorial Standards and Policies advertising